Other alternatives
Can be binding or non binding.
In binding arbitration , both parties agree to accept the decision of a neutral third party.
This has a similar outcome as a Court with the cost, and delays.
Non binding has the benefit of giving both parties, a realistic idea of how a neutral third party sees the dispute.
Which is sometimes a good way on reflecting on the validity of a claim.
Someone who acts a neutral, honest broker between the parties.
Court:
The traditional way of resolving disputes in the United States.
A high standard of justice.
Usually slow, and costly.
Sometimes unpredictable, no matter how strong you consider your case.
Arbitration:
The Go between
A case may be suitable for a number of paths.
If you would like to have some help thinking through your options, please feel free to call, at no cost.
